d5) which enters the Vienna Game Main Line.
This single best response by Black to the Vienna Gambit is (3. I'm not going to cover the Max Lange Vienna Gambit in this video, but I have a few videos on the opening: This variation is quite rare, and it isn't as good as the Falkbeer Vienna Gambit, which is usually what we mean by "Vienna Gambit". f4) and this is also known as the "Vienna Gambit". Nc6), which is known as the "Max Lange Defense" of the Vienna Game. f4)! White wins around 60% of the time from this position.īefore we move on, I'm going to just flag a couple of things that I won't be covering. f4), otherwise known as the Vienna Gambit (1.
This now allows White to play the wonderful, fun, and provocative, (3. Nf6) - the "Falkbeer Variation" of the Vienna Game. According to the Lichess community database of lower rated games of blitz and rapid, the most common next move by Black, occurring a third of the time, is the natural looking (2. Nc3), which is the start of the Vienna Game opening.īlack now has a variety of options. On the second move White develops the queen's knight (2. To play the Vienna Gambit, you must have the white pieces and begin with the king's pawn opening, and Black must respond with their king's pawn (1. The Vienna Gambit is credited to being developed by Carl Hamppe, a Swiss government official in the 1800s who spent much of his time in chess cafes in Vienna! In the earliest days, "Hamppe's Game" was seen as a potential way of playing a delayed King's Gambit. Author: Y.#vienna #viennagambit #chessopenings #howtoplay #beginnerguide We see, that gambit 4.Nf3! doesn’t give such expedient opportunity!)įinally, of course, the name of each reflected variation must be created with conservation of the name of original variation: “reflection of Nh4-Bukayev gambit” or “Nh4-Bukayev gambit reflected”, but not “Nh5-Bukayev gambit”. And even if some reflection is a result of not weak playing, then usually there is an expedient opportunity to decline a reflection after a move-reflectogen. Moreover, probably, the variation 2.d3 Bc5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Nf3! is one of the strongest and most important reflectogens in the whole world of chess theory! (It shouldn’t be forgotten, that there are extremely few reflectogens in the whole world of chess, that are important for theory: usually we see reflection as a result of weak playing: 1.c3 e5 2.c4 etc. Thus, the move-reflectogen 4.Nf3 generates the most important reflection by 4…Ng4 5.d4. This scientific term means “something GENerating REFLECTion(s)”. I suggest the term for this new strong and important gambit (4.Nf3!) and for such opening variations: “reflectogen”. That is why the gambit 4.Nf3! is new, in fact! All few games, where it was played, show, that everywhere white has made a large error in the beginning of playing and that everywhere black hasn’t used each of white’s errors. The gambit move 4.Nf3! (the sign “!” is author’s new appraisal) isn’t new nominally, but it was never considered in publications, was never commented, was almost never played. In other words, the extremely trivial idea – to reflect C58-C59 (to copy the theory of C58-C59 exactly) – is author’s new idea! About names, about importance etc. IIĦ.Na4! Bb4 7.c3!AN dc 8.bc with unclear position.
0 kommentar(er)
